Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router Capabilities
RFC 4970

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Bill Fenner) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

Comment (2007-02-07 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I agree with Mark.  I'd be OK with designated expert with clear
guidelines (probably assisted by a mailing list) although ietf
consensus might be easier.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(David Kessens) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2007-02-07 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
It would be useful to expand LSA at the first occurence in the Abstract section.

(Mark Townsley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

Comment (2007-02-02 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
The security consideration section seems thin. Isn't it recommended that one actually describe which parts of an referenced document that is applicable to this doc.