Exclude Routes - Extension to Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Ross Callon) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Nit: There are two instances of SLRG that should be SRLG.
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
Section 2., paragraph 0: > 2. Each subobject MUST be consistent. If a subobject is not con- > sistent then the node SHOULD return a PathErr with error code > "Routing Problem" and error value "Inconsistent Subobject". Where is consistency defined? Section 2., paragraph 0: > 2. The EXRS MAY be supported. If supported, the same restrictions > as for the XRO apply. Text before the list says "implementation MUST be at least compliant with the following", but this is a MAY.
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Typographical errors noted in the SecDir Review by Angelos Keromytis: - in Section 4.2: "inlcuded" - in Section 5: "some elements appears" - in A.1: "con- figured", "A1- strict" (spurious whitespace)