Exclude Routes - Extension to Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
RFC 4874

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

Comment (2006-12-08)
No email
send info
Nit: 
There are two instances of SLRG that should be SRLG.

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2006-12-11)
No email
send info
Section 2., paragraph 0:
>    2. Each subobject MUST be consistent. If a subobject is not con-
>       sistent then the node SHOULD return a PathErr with error code
>       "Routing Problem" and error value "Inconsistent Subobject".

  Where is consistency defined?


Section 2., paragraph 0:
>    2. The EXRS MAY be supported. If supported, the same restrictions
>       as for the XRO apply.

  Text before the list says "implementation MUST be at least compliant
  with the following", but this is a MAY.

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2006-12-10)
No email
send info
  Typographical errors noted in the SecDir Review by Angelos Keromytis:
    - in Section 4.2: "inlcuded"
    - in Section 5: "some elements appears"
    - in A.1: "con-  figured", "A1- strict" (spurious whitespace)

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection