Verizon Wireless Dynamic Mobile IP Key Update for cdma2000(R) Networks
RFC 4784

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
05 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The Verizon Wireless Dynamic Mobile IP Key Update procedure is a mechanism for distributing and updating ...
2017-05-16
05 (System) Changed document authors from "Christopher Carroll" to "Christopher Carroll, Frank Quick"
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Brian Carpenter
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Kessens
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2007-06-26
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-06-26
05 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4784' added by Amy Vezza
2007-06-20
05 (System) RFC published
2007-06-08
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-05-28
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-05-28
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-05-28
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-05-25
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24
2007-05-24
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2007-05-24
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
I'm with Tim on preferring to see this go to Historic.
2007-05-24
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-05-23
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2007-05-22
05 Jari Arkko
I was confused about the process. Setting the IESG Note back to what it was, and asking the rest of the IESG if they can ...
2007-05-22
05 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24 by Jari Arkko
2007-05-22
05 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2007-05-22
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2007-05-18
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2007-05-17
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tero Kivinen.
2007-05-11
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tero Kivinen
2007-05-11
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tero Kivinen
2007-05-10
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2007-05-10
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot discuss]
Has anyone from Verizon reviewed/approved this document? I am concerned about this because the word "Verizon" appears in the title.
2007-05-10
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Ron Bonica
2007-05-10
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-05-10
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-05-10
05 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
David Nelson, RADEXT co-chair provided the following feedback:

> The files that I sent today include (1) the proposed RFC, coming
> directly ...
2007-05-10
05 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Chris Newman has been changed to No Objection from Yes by Chris Newman
2007-05-10
05 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
With the specified IESG note, and the title which clearly identifies this
as a vendor-specific extension, I believe it is beneficial to the ...
2007-05-10
05 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-05-10
05 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
It sounds like we are actually saying "The IESG recommends against using this protocol."- I can go either-way but seem like bit of ...
2007-05-10
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-05-09
05 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2007-05-09
05 Ross Callon
[Ballot comment]
My "no objection" is based on the proposed IESG note, my understanding is that this is deployed, and that Verizon wireless is the ...
2007-05-09
05 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Given the proposed IESG note ("This document describes an existing deployed
technology .... The IESG recommends against using this protocol..."), I believe
that Historic ...
2007-05-09
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This draft cannot be re-approved before
1) Dan's Discuss is resolved.
2) IESG decides what note is appropriate.
3) IESG decides that ...
2007-05-09
05 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
Although we can admit as an exception discussing the document around an RFC Editor supplied source, I would not like this exception to ...
2007-05-09
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot discuss]
I suggest to hold the document until we receive the advice of the RADEXT WG chairs.
2007-05-09
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This draft cannot be re-approved before
1) IESG gets RADEXT chair opinion on whether the
  content has changed enough to warrant a ...
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko Telechat date was changed to 2007-05-10 from 2007-05-24 by Jari Arkko
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24 by Jari Arkko
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation from RFC Ed Queue by Jari Arkko
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko Taken back to IESG evaluation
2007-05-09
05 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'Actual document and diffs posted to IESG list on May 9th!' added by Jari Arkko
2007-04-24
05 Russ Housley Responsible AD has been changed to Jari Arkko from Margaret Wasserman
2005-10-18
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-09-23
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-09-23
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-09-23
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-09-22
05 Margaret Cullen Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-09-29 by Margaret Wasserman
2005-09-22
05 Margaret Cullen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman
2005-09-22
05 Margaret Cullen Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman
2005-09-22
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Kessens
2005-09-20
05 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-09-29 by Margaret Wasserman
2005-09-20
05 Margaret Cullen
[Note]: 'On agenda to clear David''s discuss.  David, there is a custom IESG note in the tracker that I believe has been agreed by ...
2005-06-16
05 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-06-08
05 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-06-06
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
I strongly suggest a Note to the RFC Editor to insert an
IANA Considerations section stating that the IANA is not
responsible for ...
2005-06-06
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Brian Carpenter
2005-06-06
05 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-06-09 by Margaret Wasserman
2005-06-06
05 Margaret Cullen Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman
2005-06-06
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Section 10 says:

  Each Public Key Organization (PKO) MUST be assigned a Public Key
  Organization Identifier (PKOID) to enable the RADIUS ...
2005-06-06
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
In my opinion this is not suitable for the standards track, and if
published should be Informational.

The draft states in several places ...
2005-06-06
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-06-03
05 Margaret Cullen Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman
2005-04-15
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: QUALCOMM Incorporated's statement about IPR claimed in draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-05.txt
2005-03-28
05 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-05.txt
2005-03-11
05 Mark Townsley
[Note]: '2005-02-08: IESG: this document violates a MUST NOT in radius, one that is not insignificant. I.e., it relates to security aspects/assumptions underlying ...
2005-03-11
05 Mark Townsley Shepherding AD has been changed to Margaret Wasserman from Thomas Narten
2005-03-03
05 David Kessens
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Harald/Suzanne and feel that it needs to be addressed with a
custom IESG note before allowing it to move ...
2005-03-03
05 David Kessens [Ballot discuss]
I agree with Harald/Suzanne
2005-03-03
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-02-17
05 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2005-02-17
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Suzanne Woolf, Gen-ART

She points out what seems like significant weaknesses in the protocol - so much so that this would have ...
2005-02-17
05 Harald Alvestrand
Review by Suzanne Woolf, Gen-ART

A few comments:

Wrong boilerplate. This could be important, as some IPR constraints
are briefly noted at the end of ...
2005-02-17
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Note]: '2005-02-08: IESG: this document violates a MUST NOT in radius, one that is not insignificant. I.e., it relates to security aspects/assumptions underlying ...
2005-02-17
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Suzanne Woolf, Gen-ART

She points out what seems like significant weaknesses in the protocol - so much so that this would have ...
2005-02-17
05 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2005-02-17
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Harald Alvestrand's statement about possible IPR claimed in draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt belonging to Verizon Wireless
2005-02-16
05 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-02-16
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.6 states the need for integrity of the RSA public key when
  it is distributed to MN manufacturers.  The ...
2005-02-16
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-02-09
05 Thomas Narten
[Note]: '2005-02-08: IESG: this document violates a MUST NOT in radius, one that is not insignificant. I.e., it relates to security aspects/assumptions underlying ...
2005-02-09
05 Thomas Narten [Ballot discuss]
Placeholder. This document violates a MUST NOT of radius, one that has security implications. Need guidance from AAA on how to proceed.
2005-02-09
05 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2005-02-09
05 Harald Alvestrand Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-02-17 by Harald Alvestrand
2005-02-09
05 Harald Alvestrand Putting back on agenda to attempt to clear issues.
2005-02-08
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot comment]
Passing my DISCUSS to Thomas, since I will be off-line for (quite) a while
2005-02-08
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2005-01-19
05 Harald Alvestrand The version number has changed from -03 to -04 in Jan 2004, without a log entry.Are there relevant changes?
2004-01-27
04 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
2004-01-08
05 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-01-08 by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
05 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
This is a complex document, and I don't guarantee that I found
everything.  However, I'm not thrilled with what I ...
2004-01-08
05 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-08
05 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
I do ask OPS Directorate to be easy on the documents that
come back for a second (or 3rd or...) time to iesg ...
2004-01-08
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-08
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
In section 2.2, the document says:

          If the MN receives the correct AAA_Authenticator (returned by the
  ...
2004-01-08
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please delete the 2nd paragraph in section 4.4. Here, the reference
      to RFC 1750 is intended to ensure that ...
2004-01-08
05 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
05 Amy Vezza Ballot has been issued by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
05 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2004-01-08
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-01-08
05 (System) Last call text was added
2004-01-08
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-01-02
05 Thomas Narten Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-01-08 by Thomas Narten
2004-01-02
05 Thomas Narten [Note]: 'IESG: The authors have responded to the comments sent, a new ID is out. Is current ID OK?' added by Thomas Narten
2003-12-04
03 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-03.txt
2003-11-21
05 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Amy Vezza
2003-11-20
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2003-11-11
02 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-02.txt
2003-10-30
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-10-29
05 Thomas Narten [Note]: 'Not ready for final approval, but would like to get security AD opinions on document and flush out remaining issues.' added by Thomas Narten
2003-10-23
05 Thomas Narten Telechat date was changed to 2003-10-30 from 2003-10-16 by Thomas Narten
2003-10-23
05 Thomas Narten State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by Thomas Narten
2003-10-10
05 Thomas Narten Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-10-16 by Thomas Narten
2003-09-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-01.txt
2003-09-02
05 Thomas Narten Area acronymn has been changed to int from gen
2003-06-25
05 Natalia Syracuse Draft Added by Syracuse, Natalia
2003-05-28
00 (System) New version available: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt