Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA)
RFC 4666

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-12-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
This normative ref has been obsoleted

   [10] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
        2279, January 1998.

Maybe better to point to latest RFC?

From MIB Doctor Mike Heard:
Abstract and front page need to say that it obsoletes RFC 3332.

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-12-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Abstract is a bit heavy on SS7-specific acronyms.

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2005-11-29)
No email
send info
Is this document intended to obsolete RFC 3332?  The file name implies a relationship, but there's nothing in the text that makes the relationship clear.

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) Abstain

Abstain (2005-11-25 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I don't have sufficient background to understand this document well
enough to either review it or to evaluate existing reviews.  I cannot
gain this background in time for this telechat.