RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Rec. H.263 Video
Draft of message to be sent after approval:
From: The IESG <email@example.com> To: IETF-Announce <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Internet Architecture Board <email@example.com>, RFC Editor <firstname.lastname@example.org>, avt mailing list <email@example.com>, avt chair <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Protocol Action: 'RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Rec. H.263 Video' to Proposed Standard The IESG has approved the following document: - 'RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Rec. H.263 Video ' <draft-ietf-avt-rfc2429-bis-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Cullen Jennings and Jon Peterson. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rfc2429-bis-10.txt
Technical Summary This document describes a scheme to packetize an H.263 video stream for transport using RTP. It also describes the syntax and semantics of the SDP parameters needed to support the H.263 video codec. The draft updates the RTP Payload Format in RFC 2429 and the media type registration in RFC 3555. This is cycling at Proposed Standard, rather than going to Draft, since there are some new optional media type parameters. Working Group Summary This was a straight forward revision of an existing protocol, bringing it up to date with current practice, and adding some optional parameters. There is no controversy surrounding the draft. Protocol Quality The protocol is widely implemented, hence the interest in revising and clarifying the payload format and media type registration. The payload format has been extensively reviewed by Magnus Westerlund; Martin Duerst provided comments during a media type review. PROTO review was done by Colin Perkins. The document had an ietf-types review on November 30 and no issues were raised.