Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Frame Relay over Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Networks
RFC 4619

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Mark Townsley) Yes

(Brian Carpenter) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-13)
No email
send info
The number of contributing authors listed is remarkable.
I would really expect this many names to be handled by
a simple list of acknowledgments.

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-15)
No email
send info
Very nice applicability statement and congestion control considerations -
careful presentation about AF vs. EF, uses of diffserv-TE classes, where
BECN/FECN can and cannot be handled, and so on.

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-16)
No email
send info
>7.7. MPLS Shim EXP Bit Values
>   If it is desired to carry Quality of Service information, the Quality
>   of Service information SHOULD be represented in the EXP field of the
>   PW MPLS label. If more than one MPLS label is imposed by the ingress
>   LSR, the EXP field of any labels higher in the stack SHOULD also
>   carry the same value.

Reference missing here?