SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows
RFC 4559

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Scott Hollenbeck) Yes

Comment (2005-12-13)
No email
send info
Shepherding AD evaluation comments are noted in the tracker.

(Brian Carpenter) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Record

Comment (2005-12-15)
No email
send info
Are HTTP Auth extensions something that should be done in an RFC Ed document?
No objection to this document, but we've done them in the past with significant
review and I thought we might have some policy about such a major HTTP header