Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.

(Ted Hardie) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) (was Discuss) No Objection

Reviewed by Scott Brim, Gen-ART

ldapbis-models-13 addresses the relationship to X.501 in a reasonable manner. DISCUSS cleared.

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

  Please add "This document obsoletes RFC 2253." to the end of the
  Abstract of draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn.

  Please add "This document obsoletes RFC 2254." to the end of the
  Abstract of draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter.  Also, the reference should
  be removed from the Abstract.  The last sentence might read:
  >
  > This document defines a human-readable string representation of
  > LDAP search filters that is appropriate for use in LDAP URLs and
  > other applications.
  >
  This wording avoids the need to wait for [LDAPURL] to be assigned
  an RFC number.

  Please add "This document obsoletes RFC 2251, RFC 2252, and 
  RFC 2256." to the end of the Abstract of draft-ietf-ldapbis-models.

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) (was Discuss) No Objection

I requested new text on privacy and gave a suggestion which only mentioned
the risks; the added text in the revision is substantive and specific, an excellent 
response!

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

- document: draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-15.txt
  page 5:   it can be prefixed by a backslash...
  on that line (at the end of line): s/0005C/005c/

(Alex Zinin) No Objection