Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base Version 2
RFC 4502

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen) Yes

Comment (2005-11-29)
No email
send info
To Scott Hollenbeck:
Yes, http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/RFC2021-Implementation.txt
is the implementation report, as was also listed in the IETF Last Call.

To address comment from Brian Carpenter, I added the following:

Notes to RFC-Editor:

In abstract, pls change:
  OLD:
    This document obsoletes RFC 2021 and the RMON2-MIB module
    contained in this memo obsoletes the RMON2-MIB module at
    RFC3273 level.
  NEW:
    This document obsoletes RFC 2021,  updates RFC 3273 and
    contains a new version of the RMON2-MIB module.

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

Comment (2005-11-25)
No email
send info
(from Gen-ART review by Harald Alvestrand)

Note: Perhaps try to make it clear to the RFC Editor that this document obsoletes both RFC 2021 and RFC 3273 - this wasn't blindingly obvious to me until I understood that RFC 3273 (Proposed in 2002) contained the pieces that were added to 2021 in order to create the complete object that we're considering for approval.

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

Comment (2005-11-23)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

Comment (2005-12-01)
No email
send info
Shouldn't a MIB going to Draft Standard normatively reference RFC 2438, the BCP about
MIBs advancing in the standards track?

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection