Domain Name System Uniform Resource Identifiers
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
(Ted Hardie) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) (was Discuss) No Objection
I still think my concerns about profiling are valid (see tracker log for my discuss comment), but since specific application uses have been removed I am clearing. I think this document is fine for use in programming languages, as input to application etc. I don't think it is well thought through enough for use inside protocols like for CRL location.
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
(David Kessens) No Objection
(Allison Mankin) No Objection
(Jon Peterson) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen) No Objection
Comment (2005-04-25 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
Informative reference  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. should ne moved to the normative references section.