The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) Member Selection Guidelines and Process
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Brian Carpenter) Yes
Comment (2005-09-09 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
Edits suggested by Leslie Daigle: Change title to: IAOC member selection guidelines and process Change 4th paragraph of section 2 to: The candidates will also be expected to exercise all the duties of an IAOC member, including being prepared to undertake any associated responsibilities. These include, but are not limited to, the setting of administrative support policies, oversight of the administrative operations of the IETF, and representing the interests of the IETF to the IAOC. The candidates must be able to undertake full participation in all Committee meetings and Committee activities.
(Bill Fenner) Yes
(Scott Hollenbeck) Yes
(Russ Housley) Yes
(Margaret Cullen) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) No Objection
Comment (2005-09-15 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
I've never understood why this is a BCP. Why do we believe we want to require community consensus to change our selection process? I don't actually have a problem doing so, I'm just confused.