IPv6 Node Requirements
RFC 4294

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-04-12
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2006-04-12
11 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4294' added by Amy Vezza
2006-04-11
11 (System) RFC published
2004-08-27
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-08-26
11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-08-26
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-08-26
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-26
11 Margaret Cullen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-23
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt
2004-08-16
11 Margaret Cullen Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-16
11 Margaret Cullen Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-16
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The first paragraph of the Introduction says: "... all IPv6 nodes can be
  expected to implement the mandatory requirements listed in this ...
2004-08-16
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2004-08-12
11 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-12
11 Margaret Cullen [Note]: 'On the agenda for Russ to check (and hopefully clear) the final discuss.' added by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-12
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-08-12
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-10.txt
2004-05-27
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-05-27
11 Amy Vezza
[Note]: 'Please review -09 version, which has been submitted but not posted as of 22-May.? In the meantime, the -09 version can be found at: ...
2004-05-27
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-27
11 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-05-26
11 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-05-26
11 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
While I'm still unhappy with the IPsec text, my comments are handled by Russ's suggested text; accordingly, I'll let him hold the DISCUSS.  ...
2004-05-26
11 Steven Bellovin [Ballot comment]
While I'm still unhappy with the IPsec text, my comments are handled by Russ's suggested text; accordingly, I'll let him hold the DISCUSS.
2004-05-26
11 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-26
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I had many, many comments on section 8.3.  My comments were longer
  than the section itself.  Given that, I decided to provide ...
2004-05-26
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The first paragraph of the Introduction says: "... all IPv6 nodes can be
  expected to implement the mandatory requirements listed in this ...
2004-05-26
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I had many, many comments on section 8.3.  My comments were longer
  than the section itself.  Given that, I decided to provide ...
2004-05-25
11 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-25
11 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
I'm still not thrilled with the DNS language, but it *does* indicate that DNS should be
generally available, since applications rely on it, ...
2004-05-25
11 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-05-24
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-09.txt
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen
[Note]: 'Please review -09 version, which has been submitted but not posted as of 22-May.  In the meantime, the -09 version can be found at: ...
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen
Steve Bellovin's discuss indicates that IKE should be a SHOULD, not a MAY.  However, this is an informational document intended to describe the current state ...
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen
Steve Bellovin's discuss indicates that IKE should be a SHOULD, not a MAY.  However, this is an informational document intended to describe the current state ...
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
11 Margaret Cullen
[Note]: 'Please review -09 version.  Has been submitted, but not published.  In the meantime, the -09 version can be found at:
http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-09.txt
Coming back to ...
2004-03-20
11 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
I cleared my Discuss which had to do with thinking the section on redirect functionality wasn't clear enough and there could be harm ...
2004-03-20
11 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-02-17
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt
2004-01-08
11 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-01-08 by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2004-01-08
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The first paragraph of the Introduction says: "... all IPv6 nodes can be
  expected to implement the mandatory requirements listed in this ...
2004-01-08
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Section 8.3 ought to relect the current thinking of the IPsec WG.
  See draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-ah-algorithms-00.

  Section 8.4 ought to relect the current ...
2004-01-08
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-01-08
11 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
I believe this text:

  DNS, as described in [RFC-1034], [RFC-1035], [RFC-3152], [RFC-3363]
  and [RFC-1886] MAY be supported.  Not all nodes will ...
2004-01-08
11 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-01-04
11 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
I have a comment back to Pekka's (in Bert's Discuss) about EDNS0, which I agree is important, but is actually just as strongly ...
2004-01-04
11 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Allison Mankin
2003-12-21
11 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
Serious issues:

1. Section 10.1.1 talks about "IP Forwarding Table MIB"
  The revision of this MIB document (that you refer to) has ...
2003-12-21
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-18
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
11 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
From OPS Directorate (Pekka):

I've reviewed this along the line, and it's pretty good stuff.

I've sent 3 editorial typos to the author ...
2003-12-18
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for  by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-17
11 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm astonished that Path MTU is a MAY -- I had thought it was a MUST.  I'd really like some more text explaining ...
2003-12-16
11 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm astonished that Path MTU is a MAY -- I had thought it was a MUST.  I'd really like some more text explaining ...
2003-12-16
11 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-12
11 Ned Freed [Ballot comment]
Nit: No copyright boilerplate
Comment: Checking all the references is sure going to be fun...
2003-12-12
11 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Ned Freed
2003-12-11
11 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-11
11 Margaret Cullen Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-11
11 Margaret Cullen Created "Approve" ballot
2003-12-11
11 (System) Last call text was added
2003-12-11
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-12-11
11 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-12-18 by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-11
11 Margaret Cullen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-10
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-07.txt
2003-11-19
11 Margaret Cullen State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Margaret Wasserman
2003-11-19
11 Margaret Cullen
Comments sent to the author and chairs:

My comments are marked with '>>'.  I've tried to included enough
context to make it clear what section ...
2003-11-18
11 Margaret Cullen [Note]: 'AD review comments sent to mailing list on 2003-08-27; discussion and revised document expected.' has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman
2003-11-18
11 Margaret Cullen
New AD Comments sent to Editor and Chairs, includes
some issues not resolved from previous AD comments:

  As it is not always possible for ...
2003-11-13
11 Margaret Cullen State Changes to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Margaret Wasserman
2003-10-27
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-06.txt
2003-10-14
11 Thomas Narten Shepherding AD has been changed to Margaret Wasserman from Thomas Narten
2003-08-27
11 Thomas Narten State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Thomas Narten
2003-08-27
11 Thomas Narten AD review comments sent to mailing list on 2003-08-27; discussion and revised document expected.
2003-08-27
11 Natalia Syracuse Draft Added by Natalia Syracuse
2003-08-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-05.txt
2003-06-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-04.txt
2003-03-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-03.txt
2002-11-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-02.txt
2002-07-05
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01.txt
2002-06-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-00.txt