Voice Message Routing Service
RFC 4238

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2005-04-08)
No email
send info
Positive review:  I've double-checked the enum wg's look at vpim-routing's registration of
two enumservices.  These match the new format that the enum wg has requested of IANA,
and they look right.

New material in the Security Considerations for how to implement
privacy as needed (support DIT and look toward the auth draft
when it finally progresses) cleared my Discuss.

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-03-03 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-03-03 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Does the current text on vPIMTelephoneNumber in 3.1 of vpimdir intentionally exclude useful non-E.164 numbers (like, say, freephone numbers, which are necessarily national-specific), or is this an unintended potential interpretation of saying that the telephone numbers that appear in this attribute are E.164 numbers?

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2005-03-02)
No email
send info
  draft-ietf-vpim-routing-09:

    s/Overview/Abstract/

    Please merge the Overview and Abstract.  The result should
    be an Abstract before the Table of Contents.

    Please delete the last paragraph of the Overview prior to
    publication as an RFC.

  draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-10:

    Please merge the Overview and Abstract.  The result should
    be an Abstract before the Table of Contents.

    Please delete the last paragraph of the Overview prior to
    publication as an RFC.

    Please delete the Working Group Summary section prior to
    publication as an RFC.

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info