RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video
RFC 4175
| Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(September 2005; Errata)
Updated by RFC 4421
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ladan Gharai , Charles Perkins | ||
| Last updated | 2020-01-21 | ||
| Replaces | draft-gharai-avt-uncomp-video | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized with errata bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 4175 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Allison Mankin | ||
| Send notices to | csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com | ||
Network Working Group L. Gharai
Request for Comments: 4175 USC/ISI
Category: Standards Track C. Perkins
University of Glasgow
September 2005
RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This memo specifies a packetization scheme for encapsulating
uncompressed video into a payload format for the Real-time Transport
Protocol, RTP. It supports a range of standard- and high-definition
video formats, including common television formats such as ITU
BT.601, and standards from the Society of Motion Picture and
Television Engineers (SMPTE), such as SMPTE 274M and SMPTE 296M. The
format is designed to be applicable and extensible to new video
formats as they are developed.
1. Introduction
This memo defines a scheme to packetize uncompressed, studio-quality
video streams for transport using RTP [RTP]. It supports a range of
standard and high-definition video formats, including ITU-R BT.601
[601], SMPTE 274M [274] and SMPTE 296M [296].
Formats for uncompressed standard definition television are defined
by ITU Recommendation BT.601 [601] along with bit-serial and parallel
interfaces in Recommendation BT.656 [656]. These formats allow both
625-line and 525-line operation, with 720 samples per digital active
line, 4:2:2 color sub-sampling, and 8- or 10-bit digital
representation.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
The representation of uncompressed high-definition television is
specified in SMPTE standards 274M [274] and 296M [296]. SMPTE 274M
defines a family of scanning systems with an image format of
1920x1080 pixels with progressive and interlaced scanning, while
SMPTE 296M defines systems with an image size of 1280x720 pixels and
progressive scanning. In progressive scanning, scan lines are
displayed in sequence from top to bottom of a full frame. In
interlaced scanning, a frame is divided into its odd and even scan
lines (called fields) and the two fields are displayed in succession.
SMPTE 274M and 296M define images with aspect ratios of 16:9, and
define the digital representation for RGB and YCbCr components. In
the case of YCbCr components, the Cb and Cr components are
horizontally sub-sampled by a factor of two (4:2:2 color encoding).
Although these formats differ in their details, they are structurally
very similar. This memo specifies a payload format to encapsulate
these and other similar video formats for transport within RTP.
2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2119].
3. Payload Design
Each scan line of digital video is packetized into one or more RTP
packets. If the data for a complete scan line exceeds the network
MTU, the scan line SHOULD be fragmented into multiple RTP packets,
each smaller than the MTU. A single RTP packet MAY contain data for
more than one scan line. Only the active samples are included in the
RTP payload: inactive samples and the contents of horizontal and
vertical blanking SHOULD NOT be transported. In instances where
ancillary data is being transmitted, the sender and receiver can
disambiguate between ancillary and video data via scan line numbers.
That is, the ancillary data will use scan line numbers that are not
within the scope of the video frame.
Scan line numbers are included in the RTP payload header, along with
a field identifier for interlaced video.
For SMPTE 296M format video, valid scan line numbers are from 26
through 745, inclusive. For progressive scan SMPTE 274M format
video, valid scan lines are from scan line 42 through 1121,
inclusive. For interlaced scan SMPTE 274M format video, valid
scan line numbers for field one (F=0) are from 21 to 560 and valid
scan line numbers for the second field (F=1) are from 584 to 1123.
For ITU-R BT.601 format video, the blanking intervals defined in
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
BT.656 are used: for 625 line video, lines 24 to 310 of field one
(F=0) and 337 to 623 of the second field (F=1) are valid; for 525
line video, lines 21 to 263 of the first field, and 284 to 525 of
the second field are valid. Other formats (e.g., [372]) may
define different ranges of active lines.
The payload header contains a 16-bit extension to the standard 16-bit
RTP sequence number, thereby extending the sequence number to 32 bits
and enabling the payload format to accommodate high data rates
without ambiguity. This is necessary as the 16-bit RTP sequence
number will roll over very quickly for high data rates. For example,
for a 1-Gbps video stream with packet sizes of at least 1000 octets,
the standard RTP packet will roll over in 0.5 seconds, which can be a
problem for detecting loss and out-of-order packets particularly in
instances where the round-trip time is greater than half a second.
The extended 32-bit number allows for a longer wrap-around time of
approximately nine hours.
Each scan line comprises an integer number of pixels. Each pixel is
represented by a number of samples. Samples may be coded as 8-, 10-,
12-, or 16-bit values. A sample may represent a color component or a
luminance component of the video. Color samples may be shared
between adjacent pixels. The sharing of color samples between
adjacent pixels is known as color sub-sampling. This is typically
done in the YCbCr color space for the purpose of reducing the size of
the image data.
Pixels that share sample values MUST be transported together as a
"pixel group". If 10-bit or 12-bit samples are used, each pixel may
also comprise a non-integer number of octets. In this case, several
pixels MUST be combined into an octet-aligned pixel group for
transmission. These restrictions simplify the operation of receivers
by ensuring that the complete payload is octet aligned, and that
samples relating to a single pixel are not fragmented across multiple
packets [ALF].
For example, in YCbCr video with 4:1:1 color sub-sampling, each group
of 4 adjacent pixels comprises 6 samples, Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Cr Cb, with the
Cr and Cb values being shared between all 4 pixels. If samples are
8-bit values, the result is a group of 4 pixels comprising 6 octets.
If, however, samples are 10-bit values, the resulting 60-bit group is
not octet aligned. To be both octet aligned and appropriately
framed, two groups of 4 adjacent pixels must be collected, thereby
becoming octet aligned on a 15-octet boundary. This length is
referred to as the pixel group size ("pgroup").
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
Formally, the "pgroup" parameter is the size in octets of the
smallest grouping of pixels such that 1) the grouping comprises an
integer number of octets; and 2) if color sub-sampling is used,
samples are only shared within the grouping. When packetizing
digital active line content, video data MUST NOT be fragmented within
a pgroup.
Video content is almost always associated with additional information
such as audio tracks, time code, etc. In professional digital video
applications, this data is commonly embedded in non-active portions
of the video stream (horizontal and vertical blanking periods) so
that precise and robust synchronization is maintained. This payload
format requires that applications using such synchronized ancillary
data SHOULD deliver it in separate RTP sessions that operate
concurrently with the video session. The normal RTP mechanisms
SHOULD be used to synchronize the media.
4. RTP Packetization
The standard RTP header is followed by a 2-octet payload header that
extends the RTP Sequence Number, and by a 6-octet payload header for
each line (or partial line) of video included. One or more lines, or
partial lines, of video data follow. This format makes the payload
header 32-bit aligned in the common case, where one scan line (or
fragment) of video is included in each RTP packet.
For example, if two lines of video are encapsulated, the payload
format will be as shown in Figure 1.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| V |P|X| CC |M| PT | Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Time Stamp |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SSRC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Extended Sequence Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|F| Line No |C| Offset |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Length |F| Line No |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|C| Offset | .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ .
. .
. Two (partial) lines of video data .
. .
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 1: RTP Payload Format showing two (partial) lines of video
4.1. The RTP Header
The fields of the fixed RTP header have their usual meaning, with the
following additional notes:
Payload Type (PT): 7 bits
A dynamically allocated payload type field that designates the
payload as uncompressed video.
Timestamp: 32 bits
For progressive scan video, the timestamp denotes the sampling
instant of the frame to which the RTP packet belongs. Packets MUST
NOT include data from multiple frames, and all packets belonging to
the same frame MUST have the same timestamp.
For interlaced video, the timestamp denotes the sampling instant of
the field to which the RTP packet belongs. Packets MUST NOT
include data from multiple fields, and all packets belonging to the
same field MUST have the same timestamp. Use of field timestamps,
rather than a frame timestamp and field indicator bit, is needed to
support reverse 3-2 pulldown.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
A 90-kHz timestamp SHOULD be used in both cases. If the sampling
instant does not correspond to an integer value of the clock (as
may be the case when interleaving), the value SHALL be truncated to
the next lowest integer, with no ambiguity.
Marker bit (M): 1 bit
If progressive scan video is being transmitted, the marker bit
denotes the end of a video frame. If interlaced video is being
transmitted, it denotes the end of the field. The marker bit MUST
be set to 1 for the last packet of the video frame/field. It MUST
be set to 0 for other packets.
Sequence Number: 16 bits
The low-order bits for RTP sequence number. The standard 16-bit
sequence number is augmented with another 16 bits in the payload
header in order avoid problems due to wrap-around when operating at
high rate rates.
4.2. Payload Header
Extended Sequence Number: 16 bits
The high order bits of the extended 32-bit sequence number, in
network byte order.
Length: 16 bits
Number of octets of data included from this scan line, in network
byte order. This MUST be a multiple of the pgroup value.
Line No.: 15 bits
Scan line number of encapsulated data, in network byte order.
Successive RTP packets MAY contains parts of the same scan line
(with an incremented RTP sequence number, but the same timestamp),
if it is necessary to fragment a line.
Offset: 15 bits
Offset of the first pixel of the payload data within the scan line.
If YCbCr format data is being transported, this is the pixel offset
of the luminance sample; if RGB format data is being transported,
it is the pixel offset of the red sample; if BGR format data is
being transported, it is the pixel offset of the blue sample. The
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
value is in network byte order. The offset has a value of zero if
the first sample in the payload corresponds to the start of the
line, and increments by one for each pixel.
Field Identification (F): 1 bit
Identifies which field the scan line belongs to, for interlaced
data. F=0 identifies the first field and F=1 the second field.
For progressive scan data (e.g., SMPTE 296M format video), F MUST
always be set to zero.
Continuation (C): 1 bit
Determines if an additional scan line header follows the current
scan line header in the RTP packet. Set to 1 if an additional
header follows, implying that the RTP packet is carrying data for
more than one scan line. Set to 0 otherwise. Several scan lines
MAY be included in a single packet, up to the path MTU limit. The
only way to determine the number of scan lines included per packet
is to parse the payload headers.
4.3. Payload Data
Depending on the video format, each RTP packet can include either a
single complete scan line, a single fragment of a scan line, or one
(or more) complete scan lines and scan line fragments. The length of
each scan line or scan line fragment MUST be an integer multiple of
the pgroup size in octets. Scan lines SHOULD be fragmented so that
the resulting RTP packet is smaller than the path MTU.
It is possible that the scan line length is not evenly divisible by
the number of pixels in a pgroup, so the final pixel data of a scan
line does not align to either an octet or a pgroup boundary.
Nonetheless, the payload MUST contain a whole number of pgroups; the
sender MUST fill the remaining bits of the final pgroup with zero and
the receiver MUST ignore the fill data. (In effect, the trailing edge
of the image is black-filled to a pgroup boundary.)
For RGB format video, samples are packed in order Red-Green-Blue.
For BGR format video, samples are packed in order Blue-Green-Red.
For both formats, if 8-bit samples are used, the pgroup is 3 octets.
If 10-bit samples are used, samples from 4 adjacent pixels form 15-
octet pgroups. If 12-bit samples are used, samples from 2 adjacent
pixels form 9-octet pgroups. If 16-bit samples are used, each pixel
forms a separate 6-octet pgroup.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
For RGBA format video, samples are packed in order Red-Green-Blue-
Alpha. For BGRA format video, samples are packed in order Blue-
Green-Red-Alpha. For 8-, 10-, 12-, or 16-bit samples, each pixel
forms its own pgroup, with octet sizes of 4, 5, 6, and 8,
respectively.
If the video is in YCbCr format, the packing of samples into the
payload depends on the color sub-sampling used.
For YCbCr 4:4:4 format video, samples are packed in order Cb-Y-Cr for
both interlaced and progressive frames. If 8-bit samples are used,
the pgroup is 3 octets. If 10-bit samples are used, samples from 4
adjacent pixels form 15-octet pgroups. If 12-bit samples are used,
samples from 2 adjacent pixels form 9-octet pgroups. If 16-bit
samples are used, each pixel forms a separate 6-octet pgroup.
For YCbCr 4:2:2 format video, the Cb and Cr components are
horizontally sub-sampled by a factor of two (each Cb and Cr sample
corresponds to two Y components). Samples are packed in order Cb0-
Y0-Cr0-Y1 for both interlaced and progressive scan lines. For 8-,
10-, 12-, or 16-bit samples, the pgroup is formed from two adjacent
pixels (4, 5, 6, or 8 octets, respectively).
For YCbCr 4:1:1 format video, the Cb and Cr components are
horizontally sub-sampled by a factor of four (each Cb and Cr sample
corresponds to four Y components). Samples are packed in order Cb0-
Y0-Y1-Cr0-Y2-Y3 for both interlaced and progressive scan lines. For
8-, 10-, 12-, or 16-bit samples, the pgroup is formed from four
adjacent pixels (6, 15, 9, or 12 octets, respectively).
For YCbCr 4:2:0 video, the Cb and Cr components are sub-sampled by a
factor of two both horizontally and vertically. Therefore,
chrominance samples are shared between certain adjacent lines.
Figure 2 shows the composition of luminance and chrominance samples
for a 6x6 pixel grid of 4:2:0 YCbCr video. The pixel group is a
group of four pixels arranged in a 2x2 matrix. The octet size of the
pgroup for progressive scan 4:2:0 video with samples sizes of 8, 10,
12, and 16 bits is 6, 15, 9, and 12 octets, respectively. For
interlaced 4:2:0 video, the corresponding pgroups are 4, 5, 6, and 8
octets.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
line 0: Y00 Y01 Y02 Y03 Y04 Y05
Cb00 Cr00 Cb01 Cr01 Cb02 Cr02
line 1: Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15
line 2: Y20 Y21 Y22 Y23 Y24 Y25
Cb10 Cr10 Cb11 Cr11 Cb12 Cr12
line 3: Y30 Y31 Y32 Y33 Y34 Y35
line 4: Y40 Y41 Y42 Y43 Y44 Y45
Cb20 Cr20 Cb21 Cr21 Cb22 Cr22
line 5: Y50 Y51 Y52 Y53 Y54 Y55
Figure 2: Chrominance/luminance composition in 4:2:0 YCbCr video
When packetizing progressive scan 4:2:0 YCbCr video, samples from two
consecutive scan lines are included in each packet. The scan line
number in the payload header is set to that of the first scan line of
the pair:
line 0/1:
Y00-Y01-Y10-Y11-Cb00-Cr00 Y02-Y03-Y12-Y13-Cb01-Cr01
Y04-Y05-Y14-Y15-Cb02-Cr02
line 2/3:
Y20-Y21-Y30-Y31-Cb10-Cr10 Y22-Y23-Y32-Y33-Cb11-Cr11
Y24-Y25-Y34-Y35-Cb12-Cr12
line 4/5:
Y40-Y41-Y50-Y51-Cb20-Cr20 Y42-Y43-Y52-Y53-Cb21-Cr21
Y44-Y45-Y54-Y55-Cb22-Cr22
Figure 3: Packetization of progressive 4:2:0 YCbCr video
For interlaced transport, chrominance samples are transported with
every other line. The first set of chrominance samples may be
transported with either the first line of field 0, or the first line
of field 1. Figure 4 illustrates the transport of chrominance
samples starting with the first line of field 0 (signaled by the
"top-field-first" MIME parameter).
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
field 0:
line 0: Y00-Y01-Cb00-Cr00 Y02-Y03-Cb01-Cr01 Y04-Y05-Cb02-Cr02
line 2: Y20-Y21 Y22-Y23 Y24-Y25
line 4: Y40-Y41-Cb20-Cr20 Y42-Y43-Cb21-Cr21 Y44-Y45-Cb22-Cr22
field 1:
line 1: Y10-Y11 Y12-Y13 Y14-Y15
line 3: Y30-Y31-Cb10-Cr10 Y32-Y33-Cb11 Cr11 Y34-Y35-Cb12-Cr12
line 5: Y50-Y51 Y52-Y53 Y54-Y55
Figure 4: Packetization of interlaced 4:2:0 YCbCr video with
top-field-first.
Chrominance values may be sampled with different offsets relative to
luminance values. For instance, in Figure 2, chrominance values are
sampled at the same distance from neighboring luminance samples. It
is also possible for a chrominance sample to be co-sited with a
luminance sample, as in Figure 5:
line 0: Y00-C Y01 Y02-C Y03 Y04-C Y05
line 1: Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15
line 2: Y20-C Y21 Y22-C Y23 Y24-C Y25
line 3: Y30 Y31 Y32 Y33 Y34 Y35
line 4: Y40-C Y41 Y42-C Y43 Y44-C Y45
line 5: Y50 Y51 Y52 Y53 Y54 Y55
Figure 5: Co-sited video sampling in 4:2:0 YCbCr video where C
designates a CbCr pair
In general, chrominance values may be placed between luminance
samples or co-sited. Positions can be designated by an integer
numbering system starting from left to right and top to bottom. The
position matrices shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8 apply for 4:2:0,
4:2:2, and 4:1:1 video, respectively:
line N: Y[0] [1] Y[2] Y[0] [1] Y[2]
[3] [4] Y[5] [3] [4] [5]
line N+1: Y[6] [7] Y[8] Y[6] [7] Y[8]
Figure 6: Chrominance position matrix for 4:2:0 YCbCr video
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
line N: Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3] Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3]
line N+1: Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3] Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3]
Figure 7: Chrominance position matrix for 4:2:2 YCbCr video
line N: Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3] Y[4] [5] Y[6]
line N+1: Y[0] [1] Y[2] [3] Y[4] [5] Y[6]
Figure 8: Chrominance position matrix for 4:1:1 YCbCr video
Although these positions do not affect the packetization order of
chrominance and luminance samples, the information is needed for
interpolation prior to display and therefore should be signaled to
the receiver.
5. RTCP Considerations
RTCP SHOULD be used as specified in RFC 3550 [RTP]. It is to be
noted that the sender's octet count in SR packets and the cumulative
number of packets lost will wrap around quickly for high data rate
streams. This means that these two fields may not accurately
represent octet count and number of packets lost since the beginning
of transmission, as defined in RFC 3550. Therefore, for network
monitoring purposes, other means of keeping track of these variables
SHOULD be used.
6. IANA Considerations
The IANA has registered one new MIME subtype along with an associated
RTP Payload Format, and has created two sub-parameter registries, as
described in the following.
6.1. MIME type registration
MIME media type name: video
MIME subtype name: raw
Required parameters:
rate: The RTP timestamp clock rate. Applications using this
payload format SHOULD use a value of 90000.
sampling: Determines the color (sub-)sampling mode of the video
stream. Currently defined values are RGB, RGBA, BGR, BGRA,
YCbCr-4:4:4, YCbCr-4:2:2, YCbCr-4:2:0, and YCbCr-4:1:1. New values
may be registered as described in section 6.2 of RFC 4175.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
width: Determines the number of pixels per line. This is an
integer between 1 and 32767.
height: Determines the number of lines per frame. This is an
integer between 1 and 32767.
depth: Determines the number of bits per sample. This is an
integer with typical values including 8, 10, 12, and 16.
colorimetry: This parameter defines the set of colorimetric
specifications and other transfer characteristics for the video
source, by reference to an external specification. Valid values
and their specification are:
BT601-5 ITU Recommendation BT.601-5 [601]
BT709-2 ITU Recommendation BT.709-2 [709]
SMPTE240M SMPTE standard 240M [240]
New values may be registered as described in section 6.2 of RFC
4175.
Optional parameters:
Interlace: If this OPTIONAL parameter is present, it indicates that
the video stream is interlaced. If absent, progressive scan is
implied.
Top-field-first: If this OPTIONAL parameter is present, it
indicates that chrominance samples are packetized starting with the
first line of field 0. Its absence implies that chrominance
samples are packetized starting with the first line of field 1.
chroma-position: This OPTIONAL parameter defines the position of
chrominance samples relative to luminance samples. It is either a
single integer or a comma separated pair of integers. Integer
values range from 0 to 8, as specified in Figures 6-8 of RFC 4175.
A single integer implies that Cb and Cr are co-sited. A comma
separated pair of integers designates the locations of Cb and Cr
samples, respectively. In its absence, a single value of zero is
assumed for color-subsampled video (chroma-position=0).
gamma: An OPTIONAL floating point gamma correction value.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
Encoding considerations:
Uncompressed video is only transmitted over RTP as specified in RFC
4175. No file format media type has been defined to go with this
transmission media type at this time.
Security considerations: See section 9 of RFC 4175.
Interoperability considerations: NONE.
Published specification: RFC 4175.
Applications which use this media type: Video communication.
Additional information: None
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Ladan Gharai <ladan@isi.edu>
IETF Audio/Video Transport working group.
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Ladan Gharai <ladan@isi.edu>
Change controller: IETF AVT Working Group
delegated from the IESG
6.2. Parameter Registration
New values of the "sampling" parameter MAY be registered with the
IANA provided they reference an RFC or other permanent and readily
available specification (the Specification Required policy of RFC
2434 [2434]). A new registration MUST define the packing order of
samples and a valid combinations of color and sub-sampling modes.
New values of the "colorimetry" parameter MAY be registered with the
IANA provided they reference an RFC or other permanent and readily
available specification if colorimetric parameters and other
applicable transfer characteristics (the Specification Required
policy of RFC 2434 [2434]).
7. Mapping MIME Parameters into SDP
The information carried in the MIME media type specification has a
specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
[SDP], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is
used to specify sessions transporting uncompressed video, the mapping
is as follows:
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
- The MIME type ("video") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name.
- The MIME subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as
the encoding name.
- Remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by copying
them directly from the MIME media type string as a semicolon-
separated list of parameter=value pairs.
A sample SDP mapping for uncompressed video is as follows:
m=video 30000 RTP/AVP 112
a=rtpmap:112 raw/90000
a=fmtp:112 sampling=YCbCr-4:2:2; width=1280; height=720; depth=10;
colorimetry=BT.709-2; chroma-position=1
In this example, a dynamic payload type 112 is used for uncompressed
video. The RTP sampling clock is 90 kHz. Note that the "a=fmtp:"
line has been wrapped to fit this page, and will be a single long
line in the SDP file.
8. Security Considerations
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [RTP] and any appropriate RTP profile. This implies
that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption.
This payload type does not exhibit any significant non-uniformity in
the receiver side computational complexity for packet processing to
cause a potential denial-of-service threat.
It is important to note that uncompressed video can have immense
bandwidth requirements (up to 270 Mbps for standard-definition video,
and approximately 1 Gbps for high-definition video). This is
sufficient to cause potential for denial-of-service if transmitted
onto most currently available Internet paths.
Accordingly, if best-effort service is being used, users of this
payload format MUST monitor packet loss to ensure that the packet
loss rate is within acceptable parameters. Packet loss is considered
acceptable if a TCP flow across the same network path, and
experiencing the same network conditions, would achieve an average
throughput, measured on a reasonable timescale, that is not less than
the RTP flow is achieving. This condition can be satisfied by
implementing congestion control mechanisms to adapt the transmission
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
rate (or the number of layers subscribed for a layered multicast
session), or by arranging for a receiver to leave the session if the
loss rate is unacceptably high.
This payload format may also be used in networks that provide
quality-of-service guarantees. If enhanced service is being used,
receivers SHOULD monitor packet loss to ensure that the service that
was requested is actually being delivered. If it is not, then they
SHOULD assume that they are receiving best-effort service and behave
accordingly.
9. Relation to RFC 2431
In comparison with RFC 2431, this memo specifies support for a wider
variety of uncompressed video, in terms of frame size, color sub-
sampling and sample sizes. Although [BT656] can transport up to 4096
scan lines and 2048 pixels per line, our payload type can support up
to 32768 scan lines and pixels per line. Also, RFC 2431 only address
4:2:2 YCbCr data, while this memo covers YCbCr, RGB, RGBA, BGR, BGRA,
and most common color sub-sampling schemes. Given the variety of
video types that we cover, this memo also assumes out-of-band
signaling for sample size and data types (RFC 2431 uses in band
signaling).
10. Relation to RFC 3497
RFC 3497 [292RTP] specifies a RTP payload format for encapsulating
SMPTE 292M video. The SMPTE 292M standard defines a bit-serial
digital interface for local area High-Definition Television (HDTV)
transport. As a transport medium, SMPTE 292M utilizes 10-bit words
and a fixed 1.485 Gbps (and 1.485/1.001 Gbps) data rate. SMPTE 292M
is typically used in the broadcast industry for the transport of
other video formats such as SMPTE 260M, SMPTE 295M, SMPTE 274M, and
SMPTE 296M.
RFC 3497 defines a circuit emulation for the transport of SMPTE 292M
over RTP. It is very specific to SMPTE 292 and has been designed to
be interoperable with existing broadcast equipment with a constant
rate of 1.485 Gbps.
This memo defines a flexible native packetization scheme that can
packetize any uncompressed video, at varying data rates. In
addition, unlike RFC 3497, this memo only transports active video
pixels (i.e., horizontal and vertical blanking are not transported).
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
11. Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Philippe Gentric, Chuck Harrison, Stephan
Wenger, and Dave Singer for their feedback.
This memo is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science
Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 0230738. Any opinions, findings,
and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
Normative References
[RTP] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD
64, RFC 3550, July 2003.
[2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[601] International Telecommunication Union, "Studio encoding
parameters of digital television for standard 4:3 and wide
screen 16:9 aspect ratios", Recommendation BT.601, October
1995.
[709] International Telecommunication Union, "Parameter Values for
HDTV Standards for Production and International Programme
Exchange", Recommendation BT.709-2
[240] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers,
"Television - Signal Parameters - 1125-Line High-Definition
Production", SMPTE 240M-1999.
Informative References
[274] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers,
"1920x1080 Scanning and Analog and Parallel Digital
Interfaces for Multiple Picture Rates", SMPTE 274M-1998.
[296] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers,
"1280x720 Scanning, Analog and Digital Representation and
Analog Interfaces", SMPTE 296M-1998.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
[372] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, "Dual
Link 292M Interface for 1920 x 1080 Picture Raster", SMPTE
372M-2002.
[ALF] Clark, D. D., and Tennenhouse, D. L., "Architectural
Considerations for a New Generation of Protocols", In
Proceedings of SIGCOMM '90 (Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 1990),
ACM.
[SDP] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.
[BT656] Tynan, D., "RTP Payload Format for BT.656 Video Encoding",
RFC 2431, October 1998.
[292RTP] Gharai, L., Perkins, C., Goncher, G., and A. Mankin, "RTP
Payload Format for Society of Motion Picture and Television
Engineers (SMPTE) 292M Video", RFC 3497, March 2003.
[656] International Telecommunication Union, "Interfaces for
Digital Component Video Signals in 525-line and 625-line
Television Systems Operating at the 4:2:2 Level of
Recommendation ITU-R BT.601 (Part A)", Recommendation
BT.656, April 1998.
Authors' Addresses
Ladan Gharai
USC Information Sciences Institute
3811 N. Fairfax Drive, #200
Arlington, VA 22203
USA
EMail: ladan@isi.edu
Colin Perkins
University of Glasgow
Department of Computing Science
17 Lilybank Gardens
Glasgow G12 8QQ
United Kingdom
EMail: csp@csperkins.org
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 4175 RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video September 2005
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Gharai & Perkins Standards Track [Page 18]