Transport Performance Metrics MIB
RFC 4150

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-14 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-DIR.

His review:
Update IPR text and Status of this Memo text.

Otherwise, ship it.

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-15)
No email
send info
The uses of transport and transaction are not careful.
There's nothing in this MIB that affects its applicability to a
transaction-oriented or a bulk-transport-oriented transport
protocol metric.

I think they inherited verbiage from the APM which did care 
about transactions.

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) No Objection