Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6
RFC 4075

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Margaret Cullen) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2004-10-28)
No email
send info
The language on IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in this document is acceptable to me.
DISCUSS removed.

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ned Freed) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
No further objection, but I concur with Pekka in believing that handling NTP
is at least as important as handling SNTP.

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
The end of the sentence in Section 3 might want to include a direct reference to the DHCPv6 spec (presumably, [1]).

(Bert Wijnen) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2004-01-20)
No email
send info
From OPS DIrectorate (Pekka):

nits: 
 - spell out SNTP in the Abstract
 - acknowledgement section should be split to a real acknowledgement 
   section, and the regular ISOC funding acknowledgement.
 - IPR statement could be added.
 - add a dot at the end of the paragraph in section 2.

(Alex Zinin) (was Discuss) No Objection