Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(David Kessens) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

These documents were reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART.

They have not been checked against the ID-NITS list.

No table of contents, no copyright boilerplate. MUST NOT used
without definition. Minor errors in English. No Security Considerations
section.

Note on "applicability":

Despite the word "applicability" in the title, this is not an Applicability
Statement in the IETF sense. The IESG needs to be sure it doesn't have a problem
with that. It's really a set of health warnings about the following document.
It does therefore need to be published at the same time.

The -intraarea- document treats IPv6 as a "poor cousin". It should say that it's equally applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 (unless it is not).

The reason this is a Comment and not a Discuss is that others hold the token for getting the security sections right. The rest should be fixed at the same time.

(Steven Bellovin) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) (was Discuss) No Objection

<Changed comment to DISCUSS...>

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Bert Wijnen) No Objection

(Alex Zinin) (was Discuss) No Objection