Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Bill Fenner) Yes
(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART His review: This document seems like a reasonable contribution to the IETF and is ready for publication.
(Steven Bellovin) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(David Kessens) No Objection
(Allison Mankin) No Objection
(Thomas Narten) No Objection
> To break the deadlock, "pre-RFC" implementations simply choose some > code points; these may turn out to be different from those later suggested reword: To break the deadlock, "pre-RFC" implementations have sometimes simply choosen some "seemingly unused" code points; I.e., we don't want to suggest that it is OK to choose...