IANA Registration for Enumservice 'web' and 'ft'
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
(Allison Mankin) Yes
(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection
Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART Things to fix: Body (section 2) mentions "RFC2619bis" without reference. I believe this is supposed to be a reference to "RFC3761 ". Abstract has references. Should be consistent between "ENUMservice" and "Enumservice". In RFC3761 (where it's defined) always uses the latter, except in productions where all LC is used, while this draft uses the former, except in the templates (which I expect it copied from RFC3761). If the document gets rev'd, I suggest being consistent with the existing RFC. On the other hand, I actually prefer the capitalization used in this document as is, so I'm not going to argue too vociferously for this. Additional nit (Harald): the HTTP and HTTPS methods seem to assume that the method that the user is going to use with the given URL is "GET". But they never say so. Given their attempt to be unclear about what's actually being done in the Introduction, this may not need addressing. The text that washes away responsibility: The services specified here are intended NOT to specify the protocol or even method of connection that MUST be used to achieve each service. Instead they define the kind of interactive behavior that an end user will expect, leaving the end system to decide (based on policies outside the remit of this specification) how to execute the service.
(Steven Bellovin) No Objection
Please cite RFC 3833 in the Security Considerations section
(Margaret Cullen) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Please remove the references () from the Abstract. Section 2 says: > > The services specified here are intended NOT to specify the protocol > or even method of connection that MUST be used to achieve each > service. > I do not understand the use of RFC 2119 language here. It is unclear to me what an implementation MUST or MUST NOT do. What would appear in an implementation report regarding this sentence?