Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses
RFC 4001

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from bwijnen@lucent.com, j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de to bwijnen@lucent.com
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2005-03-15
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-03-15
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4001' added by Amy Vezza
2005-03-01
06 (System) RFC published
2004-09-09
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-09-07
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-09-07
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-09-07
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-09-06
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bert Wijnen
2004-08-18
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-08-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-06.txt
2004-08-12
06 Bert Wijnen Checking with Juergen and Allison if we can clear the DISCUSS
2004-08-12
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-08-12 from
2004-06-08
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-06-08
06 Bert Wijnen Revision 5 did address Ted's discuss, but not Allison's.
Checking with author.
2004-06-07
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-05.txt
2004-05-27
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2004-05-27
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
Under InetScopeType, SiteLocal (5)
Please place a note next to this citing the update to RFC 3513 which deprecates site-local,
and (I think) ...
2004-05-27
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-05-27
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-05-26
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART
2004-05-26
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-05-25
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
The draft gives InetAddressDNS as:

InetAddressDNS ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
      DISPLAY-HINT "255a"
      STATUS      current
      ...
2004-05-25
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-05-14
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-05-13
2004-05-13
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-13
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-05-12
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-05-12
06 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Ted Hardie
2004-05-12
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-05-11
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-05-10
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-06
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
Is this supposed to update or obsolete RFC 2851?  It includes a section describing changes from 2851, but doesn't say anywhere if 2851 ...
2004-05-06
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-06
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
Is this supposed to update oir obsolete RFC 2851?  It includes a section describing changes from 2851, but doesn't say anywhere if 2851 ...
2004-05-06
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-06
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-06
06 Bert Wijnen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-13 by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-06
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen
2004-05-06
06 Bert Wijnen Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-06
06 Bert Wijnen Created "Approve" ballot
2004-04-24
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2004-03-25
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-03-25
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-03-25
06 Bert Wijnen Last Call was requested by Bert Wijnen
2004-03-25
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-03-25
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-03-25
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-03-25
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen
2004-03-25
06 Bert Wijnen Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2004-03-25
06 Bert Wijnen Draft Added by Bert Wijnen
2004-02-03
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-04.txt
2004-01-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-03.txt
2003-12-03
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-02.txt
2003-07-02
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-01.txt
2003-02-25
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-00.txt