The tel URI for Telephone Numbers
RFC 3966

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-01-21
09 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag)
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bill Fenner
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2004-12-07
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-12-07
09 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3966' added by Amy Vezza
2004-12-03
09 (System) RFC published
2004-08-17
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-08-17
09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-08-17
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-08-17
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-17
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2004-08-16
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-07-20
09 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bill Fenner
2004-06-29
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09.txt
2004-06-11
09 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10
2004-06-10
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for Writeup by Amy Vezza
2004-06-10
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-10
09 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph.  (Why is there extra indentation?)  When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? ...
2004-06-10
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-06-10
09 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-06-10
09 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-06-10
09 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
Question: Does this doc obsolete/replace 2806, Or is it just revising
a piece of 2806, so it basically updates 2806?

Whatever the answer, ...
2004-06-10
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-10
09 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-06-10
09 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mark Allman, gen-ART
2004-06-10
09 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-06-09
09 Bill Fenner
[Ballot discuss]
The "reserved" and "uric" productions use '|' for alternation; '/' is correct in ABNF (and all of the other productions use those).  This ...
2004-06-09
09 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-06-09
09 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-09
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Russ Housley
2004-06-09
09 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please spell out IVR. It is only used once.

  The document does uses columbia.edu in places where example.com
  ought to be ...
2004-06-09
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-06-08
09 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
5.1.1: contradictory -- clarify last paragraph.  (Why is there extra indentation?)  When you say "cannot", do you mean "MUST NOT" or "SHOULD NOT"? ...
2004-06-08
09 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-07
09 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
The document uses a number of telephone numbers which are not in the example
sets (e.g. 555-1234, which is allocated according to http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/ ...
2004-06-07
09 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3 of the document discusses URI syntax, and uses the phrase "escaped" to
describe how delimeters are treated.  This section of 2396 ...
2004-06-07
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-06-07
09 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-03
09 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Jon Peterson
2004-06-03
09 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2004-06-03
09 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2004-06-03
09 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2004-06-02
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-08.txt
2004-05-06
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-04-22
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-04-22
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-04-21
09 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2004-04-21
09 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2004-04-21
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-04-21
09 (System) Last call text was added
2004-04-21
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-04-14
09 Jon Peterson State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Jon Peterson
2004-04-14
09 Jon Peterson Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2004-04-12
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-07.txt
2004-04-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-06.txt
2004-03-23
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-05.txt
2004-03-10
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-04.txt
2004-02-16
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-03.txt
2003-09-16
09 Jon Peterson Draft Added by Jon Peterson
2003-07-02
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-02.txt
2003-06-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-01.txt
2003-06-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-00.txt