Domain-Based Application Service Location Using SRV RRs and the Dynamic Delegation Discovery Service (DDDS)
RFC 3958

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22
01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2012-08-22
01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2005-01-07
01 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-01-07
01 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3958' added by Amy Vezza
2005-01-06
01 (System) RFC published
2004-07-15
01 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-07-15
01 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-07-15
01 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-07-15
01 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-07-14
01 Ted Hardie State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ted Hardie
2004-07-14
01 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2004-07-01
01 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-07-01
01 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-06-30
01 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-06-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-daigle-snaptr-01.txt
2004-06-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-daigle-snaptr-00.txt
2004-05-28
01 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27
2004-05-27
01 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-05-27
01 Michelle Cotton Follow-up IANA Last Call comments:
Confirmed with author that assignments will go in after other documents have been approved.
2004-05-27
01 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-05-27
01 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
Nits/Editorial

  of a named application service.  The application client MUST select
  one protocol to choose The PREF field of the NAPTR ...
2004-05-27
01 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss]
> 7.3 Registration Process

IANA considerations could be more clear here (in terms of RFC 2434 (or
similar) language). Just what the requirements ...
2004-05-27
01 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
01 Bill Fenner
[Ballot comment]
Possible typo in the ABNF -

; ALPHANUM = <UNDEFINED>
iana-registered-protocol = ALPHA *31ALPHANUM ; line 7

should this be ALPHANUMSYM like the ...
2004-05-27
01 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-05-27
01 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-27
01 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-27
01 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-05-26
01 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-05-26
01 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-05-26
01 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
This document has some very long lines.  The author should come up with a
  presentation for this information that fits the line ...
2004-05-26
01 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations say:
  >
  > The security of this approach to application service location is only
  > as good ...
2004-05-26
01 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-05-25
01 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
The IANA considerations don't say what sort of RFC is needed for new registrations.  Are the categories in 2434 sufficient?

The Security Considerations ...
2004-05-25
01 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-20
01 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-20
01 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Ted Hardie
2004-05-20
01 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-27 by Ted Hardie
2004-05-20
01 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2004-05-20
01 Ted Hardie Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie
2004-05-20
01 Ted Hardie Created "Approve" ballot
2004-05-03
01 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call comments:

We understand 2 registries to be set-up.

S-NAPTR Application Service Tags
S-NAPTR Application Protocol Tags

In sections 7.1 and 7.2, there ...
2004-04-29
01 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-04-29
01 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-04-28
01 Ted Hardie [Note]: 'successor to daigle-naptsr-04.txt' added by Ted Hardie
2004-04-28
01 Ted Hardie Area acronymn has been changed to app from gen
2004-04-28
01 Ted Hardie Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie
2004-04-28
01 Ted Hardie State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie
2004-04-28
01 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-04-28
01 (System) Last call text was added
2004-04-28
01 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-04-28
01 Ted Hardie Draft Added by Ted Hardie