UDP Encapsulation of IPsec ESP Packets
RFC 3948

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
09 (System) Notify list changed from <byfraser@cisco.com>, <tytso@mit.edu> to (None)
2013-06-06
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: SSH Communications Security Corp's Statement about IPR related to RFC 3948
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Margaret Wasserman
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jon Peterson
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Ted Hardie
2006-02-03
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Microsoft Corporation's statement about IPR claimed in RFC 3948
2005-01-07
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-01-07
09 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3948' added by Amy Vezza
2005-01-05
09 (System) RFC published
2004-08-10
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-08-10
09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-08-10
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-08-10
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-10
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2004-08-09
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Abstain from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-08-08
09 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Margaret Wasserman
2004-07-29
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-05-27
09 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jon Peterson
2004-05-26
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-05
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-09.txt
2004-04-03
09 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02
2004-04-02
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-02
09 Russ Housley
Many Area Directors feel that their comments were not addressed in the updated draft.  I have asked the authors to generate a message to the …
2004-04-01
09 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-04-01
09 Harald Alvestrand
From Scott Brim, Gen-ART:

Good but there are a few nits.  The content is fine, but ...

References need to be updated, e.g. Aboda03 is …
2004-04-01
09 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Scott Brim, Gen-ART.

Comments (editorial) to tracker log. Non-blocking.
2004-03-30
09 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-24
09 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 by Russ Housley
2004-03-23
09 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Russ Housley
2004-02-17
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-08.txt
2003-12-19
09 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Comments from Rob Austein:
>
> 1) some of the weirdest stuff in this doc is due to the attempt to
>    …
2003-12-18
09 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-18 by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
09 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot discuss]
I have three issues with this document:

(1) Although the document claims that it will work for both
    IPv4 and IPv6, …
2003-12-18
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
09 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Amy Vezza
2003-12-18
09 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Allison Mankin
2003-12-18
09 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Alex Zinin
2003-12-18
09 Bill Fenner
[Ballot comment]
Call me "no further objection" - however, the NAT keepalive time reminds me that we saw (approved? I don't remember) a document that …
2003-12-18
09 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Bill Fenner
2003-12-18
09 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
> The UDP header is a standard [RFC 768] header, where
> - Source Port and Destination Port MUST be the same as …
2003-12-18
09 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss]
> A peer MAY send a NAT-keepalive packet if there exists one
> or more phase I or phase II SAs between the …
2003-12-18
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Thomas Narten
2003-12-18
09 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
Comments from OPS DIrectorate (Pekka):

 
- note that some sections like 1, 5, and 10 are indented "properly",
  a couple of …
2003-12-18
09 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
Isuses raised by OPS Directorate (Pekka)

I have serious issues with this one.  It just doesn't appear to be
ready at this point. …
2003-12-18
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Bert Wijnen
2003-12-18
09 Jon Peterson
[Ballot discuss]
Like another IPsec-related NAT document we recently reviewed, this document contains no UNSAF considerations (i.e. it should explictly answer the questions given in …
2003-12-18
09 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Jon Peterson
2003-12-17
09 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot discuss]
There are a number of problems in this draft.  Among other things,
it claims to apply to both IPv4 and IPv6, but it …
2003-12-17
09 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Margaret Wasserman
2003-12-16
09 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
5.2 and 5. 3 of the draft punt hard problems to Appendix A, which then says "not a wire protocol, so this is …
2003-12-16
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for  by Ted Hardie
2003-12-16
09 Steven Bellovin [Ballot comment]
Is the v4-only orientation enough of a problem here that we should send this back?
2003-12-16
09 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-05
09 Ned Freed [Ballot comment]
Nits:

No copyright boilerplate
No IPR boilerplate
2003-12-05
09 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for  by Ned Freed
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley Status date has been changed to 2003-12-04 from 2003-11-09
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-12-18 by Russ Housley
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2003-12-04
09 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2003-12-03
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2003-11-19
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-11-19
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-11-19
09 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2003-11-19
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed by Russ Housley
2003-11-18
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-07.txt
2003-11-09
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2003-11-09
09 Russ Housley Status date has been changed to 2003-11-09 from 2003-10-08
2003-11-04
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2003-10-21
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-10-20
09 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2003-10-20
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Last Call Requested by Russ Housley
2003-10-20
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-20
09 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-20
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-10-09
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Russ Housley
2003-10-08
09 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2003-10-08
09 Russ Housley Status date has been changed to 2003-10-08 from 2003-05-30
2003-06-06
09 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Housley, Russ
2003-05-30
09 Russ Housley Draft Added by Housley, Russ
2003-01-14
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-06.txt
2002-12-20
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-05.txt
2002-11-05
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-04.txt
2002-07-26
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Microsoft's Patent Claim pertaining to draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike and draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps
2002-06-12
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-03.txt
2002-04-19
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-02.txt
2001-10-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-01.txt
2001-06-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-00.txt