Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)
RFC 3925
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Margaret Cullen) Yes
(Bill Fenner) Yes
(Steven Bellovin) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection
Comment (2004-07-08)
No email
send info
send info
It would be helpful if the numbering system base for the option values were specified. Are they supposed to be octal, decimal, or hexadecimal?
(Allison Mankin) No Objection
Comment (2004-07-08)
No email
send info
send info
This needs to have a normative reference to RFC 2939. I don't require this to be written, but one could write a stronger security consideration, something like that there's more need for the development of the mechanisms other than 3118 with this improved vendor extension mechanism.
(Bert Wijnen) No Objection
Comment (2004-07-08)
No email
send info
send info
I assume that instead of normative reference: [3] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers.html>. they actually meanL [3] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>. that is without the suffix: .html