The Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Version 1.1
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Margaret Cullen) No Objection
(Allison Mankin) No Objection
This either needs to have id-nits check or it needs a light message on it just to make it clear it wasn't an IETF document. Here's yet another* aspect of our document series gap: next time we say to a document author they must laboriously check/redo their ABNF so it meets RFC2234bis levels, why won't they point to this document as a counter-example? The category/rules clatter here is getting deafening, I agree... :(