Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
(Alexey Melnikov) (was Discuss) Yes
I would prefer if Errata is folded into the document, references are updated and a new RFC is created. I am fine with not opening the document to any other kind of change.
(Tim Polk) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
Why on earth does the "Position list for N.N. for 2009-04-23 telechat " page in the tracker for this document point to some unrelated draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/idtracker.cgi#draft-schoenw-snmp-tc-ext) as opposed to the RFC?
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen) No Objection
I agree with Lars/Alexey that rolling in the erratas and RFC 4853 would improve the document.