The Differentiated Services Configuration MIB
RFC 3747

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen) Yes

(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection

(Steven Bellovin) No Objection

(Margaret Cullen) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ned Freed) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Allison Mankin) No Objection

(Thomas Narten) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

Comment (2003-11-20 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
This document does not have an RFC2119 boilerplate in the typical "Terminology" section. While most of the document is free of 2119 terms, the Security Considerations contains a couple instances of upper-case "RECOMMENDED". For consistency's sake, a 2119 boilerplate should be added or those 'RECOMMENDEDs' should be demoted.

(Alex Zinin) No Objection