Network Services Monitoring MIB
RFC 2248
| Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(January 1998; No errata)
Obsoleted by RFC 2788
Obsoletes RFC 1565
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Kille , Ned Freed | ||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 2248 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group N. Freed
Request for Comments: 2248 Innosoft
Obsoletes: 1565 S. Kille
Category: Standards Track ISODE Consortium
January 1998
Network Services Monitoring MIB
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
1. Introduction
A networked application is a realization of some well defined service
on one or more host computers that is accessible via some network,
uses some network for its internal operations, or both.
There are a wide range of networked applications for which it is
appropriate to provide SNMP monitoring of their network usage. This
includes applications using both TCP/IP and OSI networking. This
document defines a MIB which contains the elements common to the
monitoring of any network service application. This information
includes a table of all monitorable network service applications, a
count of the associations (connections) to each application, and
basic information about the parameters and status of each
application-related association.
This MIB may be used on its own for any application, and for most
simple applications this will suffice. This MIB is also designed to
serve as a building block which can be used in conjunction with
application-specific monitoring and management. Two examples of this
are MIBs defining additional variables for monitoring a Message
Transfer Agent (MTA) service or a Directory Service Agent (DSA)
service. It is expected that further MIBs of this nature will be
specified.
Freed & Kille Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 2248 Network Services MIB January 1998
This MIB does not attempt to provide facilities for management of the
host or hosts the network service application runs on, nor does it
provide facilities for monitoring applications that provide something
other than a network service. Host resource and general application
monitoring is handled by the Host Resources MIB at present;
development of an additional application MIB is currently underway in
the IETF.
2. Table of Contents
1 Introduction ............................................... 1
2 Table of Contents .......................................... 2
3 The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework .................... 2
3.1 Object Definitions ....................................... 3
4 Rationale for having a Network Services Monitoring MIB ..... 3
4.1 General Relationship to Other MIBs ....................... 4
4.2 Restriction of Scope ..................................... 4
4.3 Configuration Information ................................ 4
5 Application Objects ........................................ 5
6 Definitions ................................................ 5
7 Changes made since RFC 1565 ................................ 16
8 Acknowledgements ........................................... 16
9 References ................................................. 16
10 Security Considerations ................................... 17
11 Author and Chair Addresses ................................ 18
12 Full Copyright Statement .................................. 19
3. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework
The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of seven major
components. They are:
o RFC 1902 [1] which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
describing and naming objects for the purpose of management.
o RFC 1903 [2] defines textual conventions for SNMPv2.
o RFC 1904 [3] defines conformance statements for SNMPv2.
o RFC 1905 [4] defines transport mappings for SNMPv2.
o RFC 1906 [5] defines the protocol operations used for network
access to managed objects.
o RFC 1907 [6] defines the Management Information Base for SNMPv2.
o RFC 1908 [7] specifies coexistance between SNMP and SNMPv2.
Freed & Kille Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 2248 Network Services MIB January 1998
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
3.1. Object Definitions
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
Show full document text