Last Call Review of draft-sheffer-running-code-04
review-sheffer-running-code-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-04-25-00

Request Review of draft-sheffer-running-code
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-05-10
Requested 2013-04-17
Authors Yaron Sheffer, Adrian Farrel
Draft last updated 2013-04-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Review review-sheffer-running-code-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-04-25
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-04-25

Review
review-sheffer-running-code-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-04-25






I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>




 




Document:                         draft-sheffer-running-code-04




 




Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg




 




Review Date:                     23 April 2013




 




IETF LC End Date:             10 May 2013




 




IETF Telechat Date           N/A




 




Summary:  The draft is well written, with a minor issues/question.




 




Major Issues: None




 




Minor Issues: I think it would be good to also describe and/or reference the test cases that were performed in order to determine the interoperability. In some cases it may be obvious, but if an Internet-Draft specifies a large protocol,
 with many features and options, just saying that there exist interoperability between two implementations doesn’t really say much.




 




Editorial nits: None




 




Best regards,




 




Christer