Last Call Review of draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00
review-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00-secdir-lc-montville-2016-05-05-00

Request Review of draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-05-13
Requested 2016-04-21
Draft last updated 2016-05-05
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Adam Montville (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -?? by √Čric Vyncke
Assignment Reviewer Adam Montville
State Completed
Review review-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00-secdir-lc-montville-2016-05-05
Reviewed rev. 00 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-05-05

Review
review-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00-secdir-lc-montville-2016-05-05

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft is ready.

I found the draft readable and easy to understand.   I agree with the statement made in the Security Considerations section that, being a process document, there are no real security considerations.  I also agree with the perspective that a draft with an Implementation Status section probably has implementations, which, in turn, may mean that the protocol was more deeply examined and therefore more likely to be secured well.

Kind regards,

Adam


Attachment:


signature.asc




Description:

 Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail