Last Call Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03
review-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-01-02-00

Request Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2014-01-10
Requested 2013-12-18
Draft last updated 2014-01-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Bert Wijnen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Bert Wijnen
State Completed
Review review-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-01-02
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2014-01-02

Review
review-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-01-02

sorry, mistyped the opsdir mlist


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: OPSDIR review of: draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:58:04 +0100
From: Bert Wijnen <bwijnen at ripe.net>
To: draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1.all at tools.ietf.org
CC: opsdir at ietf.org

I did OPSDIR review for this document.

From an operational and NM aspect, I do not see any issues.

I do have some general questions/comments though.
(None of them blocking though)

- The documents iften says "this standard".
  That feels weird. It is targeted for INFORMATIONAL document
  and if with "this standard" it is meant to say "ietf standard", then
  that status is something that may change over the liftime of an RFC.
  I think it might be better to use "this document" or "this memo".
- IN the security considerations section it syas:
     and relevant guidelines (e.g., SP 800-61-1) should be taken
  And in the change log it says:
     A reference was added to SP 800-132 for its recommendations...
  But I am missing the "citation" and the item in the REFERENCES section.
  I guess those active in security AREA all know where to find this,
  but for other readers it might be handy to have that refeneces in the
  list of references.

Bert