Last Call Review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-11

Request Review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-09-23
Requested 2015-08-27
Authors Tero Kivinen, Paul Wouters, Hannes Tschofenig
Draft last updated 2015-09-15
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont 
State Completed
Review review-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-11-genart-lc-dupont-2015-09-15
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 14)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-09-15


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-11.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150911
IETF LC End Date: 20150923
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and 6 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 1 page 3: IMHO the choice of the SubjectPublicKeyInfo format is
  the right one.

 - 3 page 4: is a a very -> is a very

 - A.1 page 8 and A.2 page 10: i.e. -> i.e.,

 - A pages 7 - 10: BTW I used your 2 examples to add new unit tests in
  an application crypto library so I can confirm the 2 SPKIs are correct.


Francis.Dupont at