Last Call Review of draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Reviewer: Roni Even
IETF LC End Date: 2015–5-13
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Standard Track RFC
Some questions about the terminology in section 3
Client – is this different from RFC6940, if not why repeat?
Router – this is a different name for a peer? I also noticed that it is used once in the document (defining constrained node) where it does not provide any value
Proxy and Proxy node – Why do you need both terms. In section 7 it uses proxy(PN) like it is the same term.
Constrained node the last sentence “In the latter case the node is often connected to a continuous energy power supply” it is not clear what is the latter case, also what type of node is meant. Note that there is a redundant “either a” in the previous sentence.