Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
review-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-06-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-06-28 | |
| Requested | 2019-06-14 | |
| Draft last updated | 2019-06-28 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Yoshifumi Nishida
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Chris Lonvick (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Chris Lonvick |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-06-28 | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qkdCr4DITWV9L8B0egTqAGDbo2U | |
| Reviewed rev. | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2019-06-28 |
Review
review-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-06-28
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is READY. I mostly skimmed this informational document. It appears to be well laid out and complete. The Security Considerations section is succinct and offers, "This document does not have new specific security considerations beyond those already reported by each of the documents cited." I believe that is sufficient for this document. Regards, Chris