Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-09-12
Requested 2018-08-29
Authors Marc Petit-Huguenin, Gonzalo Salgueiro, Felipe Garrido
Draft last updated 2018-09-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -09 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by √Čric Vyncke (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Roni Even (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -10 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09-genart-lc-even-2018-09-03
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 18)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2018-09-03


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and minor issues

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document does not introduce any
   specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification attack

Nits/editorial comments: 

1.  In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?