Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03
review-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03-genart-lc-halpern-2013-12-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-12-27
Requested 2013-12-19
Draft last updated 2013-12-20
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Victor Kuarsingh (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel Halpern
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03-genart-lc-halpern-2013-12-20
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2013-12-20

Review
review-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03-genart-lc-halpern-2013-12-20

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03
    Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer
             Protocol Negotiation Extension
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 20-December-2013
IETF LC End Date: 27-December-2013
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:


    It appears that the ProtocolNameList is required to have at least 


two entries, based on "protocol_name_list<2..2^16-1>.  Why are at least 


two required, and how is the reconciled with the fact that when the the 


servers send a response using this construct it is required to include 


only 1 value?




Nits/editorial comments: