Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-10
review-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-10-secdir-lc-emery-2014-08-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-08-19
Requested 2014-07-03
Draft last updated 2014-08-07
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Shawn Emery (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Shawn Emery (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Shawn Emery
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-10-secdir-lc-emery-2014-08-07
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 12)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-08-07

Review
review-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-10-secdir-lc-emery-2014-08-07



















Adding secdir, sorry for the duplicate post to this draft's list.

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This informational draft describes the various security issues with time
distribution protocols, specifically the Network Time Protocol (NTP) and
the Precision Time Protocol (PTP).  This is my second review of this draft
and I believe that all of my comments/concerns have been addressed in this
version of the draft.  Thank you.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

None.

Shawn.
--