Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16
review-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16-iotdir-telechat-eddy-2020-06-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2020-07-07
Requested 2020-06-25
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Mark Allman
Draft last updated 2020-06-30
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Liang Xia (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -16 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -16 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Comments
Thank you in advance

-éric
Assignment Reviewer Wesley Eddy 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16-iotdir-telechat-eddy-2020-06-30
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/KGPrkW0KJeW__Bf8gWaOXk0d4FY
Reviewed rev. 16 (document currently at 17)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-06-30

Review
review-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16-iotdir-telechat-eddy-2020-06-30

This document is clear and easy to understand.

From an IoT perspective, I don't have any specific concerns with it.  The CoAP spec (RFC 7522) was written referencing an early version of this I-D, so it has already been applied for designing IoT protocols.

There are a couple of small typos:
- In Section 4 part (1), there is a typo "an some" should just be one of those words.
- In Section 4 part (2), there is a typo "is is".