Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-10-25
Requested 2017-10-09
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Andrea Bittau, Daniel Giffin, Mark Handley, David Mazieres, Quinn Slack, Eric Smith
Draft last updated 2017-10-22
Completed reviews Rtgdir Telechat review of -07 by John Drake (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Stephen Kent (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dale Worley (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -10 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Dale Worley (diff)
Please focus on any potential impact on routing applications (BGP, LDP, etc.).
Assignment Reviewer John Drake 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07-rtgdir-telechat-drake-2017-10-22
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 15)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-10-22



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ‚Äč

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07
Reviewer: John Drake
Review Date: 20-Oct-2017
Intended Status: Standards Track


    No issues found. This document is ready for publication.


   The document was well structured, clear, and comprehensive, and I found it immensely entertaining.

Major Issues:

    No major issues found

Minor Issues:

    No minor issues found

Yours Irrespectively,