Last Call Review of draft-ietf-taps-transports-11

Request Review of draft-ietf-taps-transports
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-09-09
Requested 2016-08-24
Authors Gorry Fairhurst, Brian Trammell, Mirja Kühlewind
Draft last updated 2016-10-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Paul Hoffman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-taps-transports-11-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-10-05
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 14)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2016-10-05


I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were
 written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors.

Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.


I think this document is written very clear and is an very good reference guide to all the transport layer protocols being developed by IETF, good resource to Wikipedia.


IMHO, the document would be more useful (in IETF) to show which applications are actually using those less popular protocols, like FLUTE, NORM, DCCP, SCTP, RTP etc. Who
 uses FLUTE? NORM? DCCP? I understand that SS7 uses SCTP, but are there any others using SCTP?


The document missed the DCTCP, the GTP transport layer protocol (used within 






Not sure why ICMP is listed in parallel with TCP/UDP. If ICMP is included, many others should be included,  


Linda Dunbar