Telechat Review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-taps-minset
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-09-11
Requested 2018-09-05
Draft last updated 2018-09-06
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -10 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Review review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-09-06

Review
review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2018-09-06
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-04
IESG Telechat date: 2018-09-13

Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC

(Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of the IESG):

This was a big effort, and it appears that it was helpful to the folks
working on the interface document, but it's not clear how it will be
useful to implementers. The IESG should consider  whether this, like
requirements documents, needs to be in the RFC series. The most likely
use I can see in the future would be for historians, and a different
and shorter presentation would serve them better.