Telechat Review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-taps-minset |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2018-09-11 | |
| Requested | 2018-09-05 | |
| Authors | Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing | |
| Draft last updated | 2018-09-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Yaron Sheffer (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff) Rtgdir Telechat review of -10 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2018-09-06 |
Review
review-ietf-taps-minset-08-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-09-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-taps-minset-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2018-09-06 IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-04 IESG Telechat date: 2018-09-13 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC (Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of the IESG): This was a big effort, and it appears that it was helpful to the folks working on the interface document, but it's not clear how it will be useful to implementers. The IESG should consider whether this, like requirements documents, needs to be in the RFC series. The most likely use I can see in the future would be for historians, and a different and shorter presentation would serve them better.