Last Call Review of draft-ietf-stir-certificates-15
review-ietf-stir-certificates-15-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-11-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-stir-certificates |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-11-30 | |
| Requested | 2017-11-16 | |
| Authors | Jon Peterson, Sean Turner | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-11-26 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Ralph Droms
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Joel Halpern (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Klaas Wierenga (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-stir-certificates-15-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-11-26 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 15 (document currently at 18) | |
| Review result | Has Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2017-11-26 |
Review
review-ietf-stir-certificates-15-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-11-26
Hi, OPS-DIR, Authors, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This standard stack document describes the use of certificates in establishing authority over telephone numbers, as a component of a broader architecture for managing telephone numbers as identities in protocols like SIP. This document is well written. It is ready with minor nits. Major issue: no. Nits issue: RFC 8017, RFC 8224 and RFC 8225 are NOT the registered downref. They are normative reference to Informational RFCs. Regards, Sheng