Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-12-14
Requested 2017-11-30
Authors Clarence Filsfils, Stefano Previdi, Gaurav Dawra, Ebben Aries, Petr Lapukhov
Draft last updated 2018-01-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -03 by Susan Hares (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Martin Stiemerling (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08-opsdir-lc-tsou-2018-01-18
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-01-18


Dear all,

Reviewer: Carlos Martinez
Review Result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments  just like any other last call comments.

I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an informational document.

Some nits:

4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
should be
Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session

7.  Addressing the open problems
the same could be re-used in context of
   other domains as well
A period is missing in the end.

Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?

Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it would be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking intra-domain topology and policy.

Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in VPP ?

Thank you,