Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

Request Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-05-28
Requested 2018-05-11
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Ahmed Bashandy, Clarence Filsfils, Stefano Previdi, Bruno Decraene, Stephane Litkowski
Draft last updated 2018-05-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tomonori Takeda
State Completed
Review review-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11-rtgdir-lc-takeda-2018-05-27
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 15)
Review result Has Issues
Review completed: 2018-05-27



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ‚Äč 

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. 

 Document: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11 
 Reviewer: Tomonori Takeda 
 Review Date: May 26th, 2018
 IETF LC End Date: Not known 
 Intended Status: Standards Track

This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.

Major Issues:

Minor Issues:
I am a little bit confused about the relationship of SR/LDP interworking and migration from LDP to SR.

The document says:
   "This document outlines the mechanisms through which SR interworks
   with LDP in cases where a mix of SR-capable and non-SR-capable
   routers co- exist within the same network and more precisely in the
   same routing domain."

My understanding of SR/LDP interworking and migration from LDP to SR is a different story.
Migration from LDP to SR may or may not use SR/LDP interworking.

Section 3 described migration from LDP to SR, but this migration scenario does not use 
SR/LDP interworking (expect for SR-based FRR usage to protect LDP traffic).
This migration scenario uses SR/LDP co-existence, though.

Is section 3 for information purpose only?


Tomonori Takeda