Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-genart-lc-taylor-2015-06-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 00)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-06-17
Requested 2015-06-04
Authors Adam Roach
Draft last updated 2015-06-18
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -00 by Tom Taylor
Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Hilarie Orman
Opsdir Last Call review of -00 by Tim Wicinski
Assignment Reviewer Tom Taylor 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-genart-lc-taylor-2015-06-18
Reviewed rev. 00
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2015-06-18

Review
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-genart-lc-taylor-2015-06-18

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00
Reviewer:  Tom Taylor
Review Date:      17 June 2015
IETF LC End Date: 17 June 2015
IESG Telechat date: 25 June 2015



Summary: This is a very short document expanding on a sentence in RFC 


6665 to make clear the requirements surrounding use of GRUUs in the SIP 


event framework. It is probably good to go except for a minor issue of 


terminology that needs clarification. The reviewer apologizes for not 


being current on that terminology if it is a matter of common usage.




Major issues: None.



Minor issues: The term "local target" is used in the text (and in RFC 


6665. RFC 3261 speaks of a remote target, but not a local one. In which 


document is "local target" defined?




Nits/editorial comments: None.