Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-13

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2019-03-20
Requested 2019-03-06
Authors Udayasree Palle, Dhruv Dhody, Yosuke Tanaka, Vishnu Beeram
Draft last updated 2019-05-08
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -10 by Andy Malis (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Donald Eastlake (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by David Schinazi (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Tim Chown
Assignment Reviewer Tim Chown 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-13-opsdir-lc-chown-2019-05-08
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 13
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-05-08


I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The document defines the extensions required for the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) required for the deployment of stateful PCEs to support point-to-multipoint (P2MP) TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs), detailing the message and object formats used.

It is well-written with a good structure.  While not a subject matter expert, I found the document to flow very well, and the use of examples is appreciated.  Including a Manageability section in addition to the usual Security section is also helpful.