Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-08-29
Requested 2018-08-15
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Jeff Tantsura, Uma Chunduri, Sam Aldrin, Peter Psenak
Draft last updated 2018-08-20
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Tal Mizrahi (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -15 by Tal Mizrahi (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -17 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -20 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tal Mizrahi
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15-rtgdir-lc-mizrahi-2018-08-20
Reviewed rev. 15 (document currently at 25)
Review result Has Issues
Review completed: 2018-08-20



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi
Review Date: 21-Aug-2018
Intended Status: Standards Track


This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of minor
issues and nits that should be resolved prior to publication.
*Minor Issues:*

   - Figure 1 seems to indicate that the MSD-Type and the MSD-Value are 2
   octets long each, whereas according to the text afterwards each of the two
   fields is 1 octet long.
   - Figure 2 – same comment.


   - “provisioned..” --> “provisioned.” (extra period)
   - “Acknowledgements” --> “Acknowledgments”
   - “capabilites” --> “capabilities”
   - “the the” --> “the”