Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03
review-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-12-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-12-17
Requested 2013-11-27
Authors Alvaro Retana, Stan Ratliff
Draft last updated 2013-12-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Christer Holmberg
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Stephen Kent (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-12-02
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 04)
Review result Almost Ready
Review completed: 2013-12-02

Review
review-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-12-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
 
Document:                         draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03
 
Reviewer:                          Christer Holmberg
 
Review Date:                      28 November 2013
 
IETF LC End Date:              17 December 2013
 
IETF Telechat Date:            N/A
 
Summary:  The document is well written, but with one minor issue that the authors may want to consider addressing.
 
Major Issues: None
 
Minor Issues:

As an outsider, it is a little difficult for me to get a picture of exactly how the document updates RFC 5820. Would it be possible to add a few words to the last paragraph in the introduction. Something like:

"This document updates [RFC5820] by describing the use of the MANET interface in single-hop broadcast networks, by blah blah blah, blah blah blah, and blah blah blah."
 
Editorial nits: None