Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09
review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-10-02
Requested 2017-09-18
Authors Anoop Ghanwani, Linda Dunbar, Mike McBride, Vinay Bannai, Ramki Krishnan
Draft last updated 2017-10-05
Completed reviews Tsvart Last Call review of -09 by Colin Perkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Tianran Zhou (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -11 by Colin Perkins
Assignment Reviewer Carl Wallace 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-10-05

Review
review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  security
area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat  these
comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.


The draft provides additional detail for handling multi-cast vs the
material in RFC7365 and RFC8014. The draft references RFC8014 for Security
Considerations content, which in turn reference RFC7365. This seems fine
(though I was surprised the additional depth of detail on multi-cast did
not generate any additional detail in the security considerations section).