Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14-opsdir-lc-bradner-2019-11-05-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-11-07 | |
| Requested | 2019-10-24 | |
| Authors | Jesse Gross, Ilango Ganga, T. Sridhar | |
| Draft last updated | 2019-11-05 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -01 by John Drake
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -08 by Magnus Nystrom (diff) Tsvart Early review of -08 by David Black (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by Tal Mizrahi (diff) Genart Last Call review of -14 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Scott Bradner (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott Bradner |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14-opsdir-lc-bradner-2019-11-05 | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/NZykS9BcTKXskjgyadGWu75Rc5s | |
| Reviewed rev. | 14 (document currently at 16) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2019-11-05 |
Review
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14-opsdir-lc-bradner-2019-11-05
This is an OPS-DIR review of Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation This ID proposes a new control plane agnostic tunneling protocol primarily for network virtualization related applications. While the document does not have a specific operational considerations section it is a very well written document that clearly explains the issues with and features of the proposal which includes most of the operations related considerations. I did not see any such issues that the document did not already deal with. I do have one question – why, in section 4.3.1 (5) is this not a MUST